About drasties
Contact Us
Chat Room
Al Qaeda steekt Californie in brand.
Fox News: Al Qaeda is causing the CA wildfires.
This morning on Fox News, hosts of the show Fox and Friends blamed the wildfires in California on a new culprit: al Qaeda. They pointed to a 2003 FBI memo, which raised the possibility that al Qaeda may try to set wildfires around the western United States. They also noted that men in a “hovering helicopter” saw “a guy starting one of these fires.”
Later in the segment, host Steve Doocy acknowledged that in memo, al Qaeda didn’t even mention California. “They mention Colorado, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming,” he added.
Digg It!
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:48 am
well if it was alqaeda (laughable) then the whole ‘fighting them over there so we dont have to fight them here’ has just been blown out of the water..
it was blackwater who set the fires.
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:48 am
Well, when you have no real news to report that supports your causes, why not just make it up? I can’t believe anyone with an IQ above room temperature can actually watch this station.
‘A hovering helicopter saw someone start a fire’. Well, then, there you go. Proof positive. The grand old USA doesn’t have any arsonists as it’s citizens..no way Jose.
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:50 am
BWAAAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
I thought it was Bill Clinton!
Get your stories straight!
Please middle America - turn off the TV, walk outside - and get some exercise.
When you come back in the house - shoot your TV.
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:51 am
Anything good that happens.. Bush was responsible.
Anything bad, Al Qaeda (and sometimes Clinton) was responsible.
The Republican strategy for winning the 2008 Election in a nutshell.
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:52 am
Hmmm. You folks are pretty closed minded if you don’t even allow the idea that this could be true.
Terrorism comes in many forms, and doesn’t have to utilize expensive and difficult to transport weaponry when just a match will do, and you can get matches free from any convenience store with the purchase of just one pack of cigarettes.
I find it interesting that libs will continuously pipe up about how all the evidence was there to foretell the 9/11 attacks, thus blaming the Bush administration for ignoring that evidence, yet ignore the possibility that these fires COULD be the work of terrorists, even though the idea is discussed in the same type of evidence that pointed to the 9/11 attacks.
Why is the only consistency of thought liberals seem to engage in directed at hating George Bush at all costs, rather than actually acknowledging that the United States does have enemies out there.
And our own government is NOT the enemy, regardless of how much the kook left would like to think it is.
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:53 am
“And our own government is NOT the enemy, regardless of how much the kook left would like to think it is.”
state sponsored terrorism is still terrorism… glad to know you are a card carrier for Dumb-fuk-istan
oktober 25th, 2007 at 8:57 am
If this is correct? IF? As if?
Comment
No. Of course this is complete bullshit. There is a whole list of problems with this ‘news report’.
1) Why did the police sit in their helicopter and just watch someone start a fire?
2) Was the arsonist wearing a sign that says ‘I belong to Al Qaeda’ while he was setting the fire?
3) If the Fed’s knew of this plot back in June, why didn’t they do anything to prevent it? Why doesn’t Fox report on the Bush Administration’s willingness to allow this attack to take place?