Bush cheerleader ziet het nu heel anders
Het, ‘ik heb het niet gedaan’, ‘ik was er niet bij’ en soms zelfs ’sorry’, is nog steeds niet van de lucht in de Verenigde Staten, nu het debakel van de Bush-presidentschap zelfs tot de grootste stomkoppen doordringt. Hier een voorbeeld van een jarenlange Bush-volgeling die schrijft in ’s werelds toonaangevende tijdschrift, Time. Overigens heeft JdW zijn abonnenment op dat flutblaadje al jaren geleden opgezegd, pleepapier genoeg.
Time-Journalist Joe Klein, twee uitspraken over Bush:
November 2008: ‘…zijn belachelijke, opgedofte optreden in dat vliegenierspak… onder het Mission Accomplished bord’.
Mei 2003: ‘het coolste beeld van een president sinds…’

preening = gladstrijken van de veren, optutten, opdoffen
Joe Klein’s extreme revisionism
Joe Klein, this week’s Time Magazine, on George Bush’s legacy:
Bush has that forlorn what-the-hell-happened? expression on his face, the one that has marked his presidency at difficult times. You never want to see the President of the United States looking like that.
I’d add the bracing moment of Bush with the bullhorn in the ruins of the World Trade Center, but that was neutered in my memory by his ridiculous, preening appearance in a flight suit on the deck of the aircraft carrier beneath the “Mission Accomplished” sign. The flight-suit image is one of the two defining moments of the Bush failure.
Joe Klein, Face the Nation, May 4, 2003, with Bob Schieffer — 3 days after Bush’s Mission Accomplished speech:
read on here>>
BOB SCHIEFFER: How does [the Democratic presidential primary debate] play off against the pictures we saw this week of President Bush landing on the aircraft — aircraft carrier and appearing before these screaming, adoring groups of military people? As far as I’m concerned, that was one of the great pictures of all time. And if you’re a political consultant, you can just see campaign commercial written all over the pictures of George Bush.
JOE KLEIN: Well, that was probably the coolest presidential image since Bill Pullman played the jet fighter pilot in the movie Independence Day. That was the first thing that came to mind for me. And it just shows you how high a mountain these Democrats are going to have to climb. You compare that image, which everybody across the world saw, with this debate last night where you have nine people on a stage and it doesn’t air until 11:30 at night, up against Saturday Night Live, and you see what a major, major struggle the Democrats are going to have to try and beat a popular incumbent president.
I’m glad that many people, including some journalists, seem to have learned some lessons from the Bush era now that he’s almost certainly the single most unpopular President in modern American history. People who regret their mistakes and learn from them should be welcomed and encouraged. But a vital aspect of what happened over the last eight years is the role the media — our leading media stars — played in glorifying and venerating George Bush, and that can’t be re-written or forgotten.
Truly learning from one’s mistakes — as opposed to wet-finger-in-the-air abandoment of previously revered leaders when they are revealed as failures and lose their power — requires, at the very least, an acknowledgment of one’s own role in what happened. There have been very few mea culpas from establishment media journalists, many — most — of whom, to this day, think they did nothing wrong (”It was all Judy Miller!“). As bad as this absence of remorse is, it is simply intolerable to watch those who cheered on many of the worst excesses try now to pretend that they were skeptical, adversarial critics all along. Journalists with influential platforms have responsibilities, the primary one of which is to be accountable for what they say and do.
UPDATE: Tristam Shandy notes some other relevant highlight reels from Joe Klein.







november 27th, 2008 at 3:04 am
Klein would have earned a significant amount of respect by digging out the passages Glenn highlights and saying something to the effect of “Boy was I a buffoon to think that! Please forgive me for getting caught up in the moment and I will try to have a bit more perspective as I move ahead.” He then could have put forward his current observations on Bush without claiming to have always felt that way.
november 27th, 2008 at 3:05 am
Many journalists simply haven’t adjusted to the fact that everybody has a complete and instantly accessible cuttings library now. It means their old evasions and reinterpretations of history are much easier to expose. in turn this means they are being brought down several pegs, and it’s only human to dislike that, and perhaps be in denial about it.